Filed: Apr. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2155 MILTON MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK; MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02182-JFM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Ci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2155 MILTON MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK; MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02182-JFM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Cir..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2155 MILTON MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK; MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02182-JFM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Milton McCray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Bennett, No. 1:06- cv-02182-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We deny McCray’s motion to enforce his rights and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
