Filed: Jun. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7991 BLAKE KELLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons; LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cv-01303-PJM) Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7991 BLAKE KELLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons; LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cv-01303-PJM) Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: Ju..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7991 BLAKE KELLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons; LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cv-01303-PJM) Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: June 4, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Blake Keller, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Blake Keller, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Keller v. Gonzales, No. 8:06-cv-01303-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
