Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, 06-2281 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-2281 Visitors: 50
Filed: Jun. 26, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2281 ALFRED T. THOMAS; RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; RAYMOND GIOVANELLI; MUFFET GARBER; MICHELE E. MORRIS; MARIA B. PETREA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00238) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILL
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2281 ALFRED T. THOMAS; RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; RAYMOND GIOVANELLI; MUFFET GARBER; MICHELE E. MORRIS; MARIA B. PETREA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00238) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfred T. Thomas, Randy L. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:06-cv-00238 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2006). We deny Thomas’ motions to certify and for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer