Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barry v. Gonzales, 06-1757 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1757 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 13, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1757 MADIOU BARRY, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (No. A96-085-139) Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 13, 2007 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1757 MADIOU BARRY, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (No. A96-085-139) Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 13, 2007 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristin K. Edison, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Madiou Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Barry’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Barry, No. A96-085-139 (B.I.A. June. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer