Filed: Jul. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6200 JERRY BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; WARDEN, MacDougall Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03013-DCN) Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6200 JERRY BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; WARDEN, MacDougall Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03013-DCN) Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided:..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6200
JERRY BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina
Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER,
Attorney General of the State of South
Carolina; WARDEN, MacDougall Correctional
Institution,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(3:06-cv-03013-DCN)
Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit
Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not
appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).
A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any
dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise
debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);
Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d
676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the
record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -