Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

East TN Natural Gas v. Lawson, 05-1050 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1050 Visitors: 51
Filed: Jul. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1050 EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN BRADLEY LAWSON; KENT WISE; STEVEN WISE, Defendants - Appellants, and 2.61 ACRES IN HENRY COUNTY, VIRGINIA; LUCY CLARK, Commissioner of Revenue; UNKNOWN OWNERS; JOHN DOE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-117-4) Submitted: June 29,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1050 EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN BRADLEY LAWSON; KENT WISE; STEVEN WISE, Defendants - Appellants, and 2.61 ACRES IN HENRY COUNTY, VIRGINIA; LUCY CLARK, Commissioner of Revenue; UNKNOWN OWNERS; JOHN DOE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-117-4) Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: July 18, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Bradley Lawson, Kent Wise, Steven Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Lela Merrell Hollabaugh; Michael Scott Mizell, WALLER, LANSDEN, DORTCH & DAVIS, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: John Bradley Lawson, Kent Wise, and Steven Wise appeal the district court’s order awarding $19,220 to land owners in a condemnation proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See East Tn. Natural Gas Co. v. 2.61 Acres in Henry County, Va., No. CA-02-117-4 (W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer