Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Simuel v. Lee, 07-6077 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6077 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6077 DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBY LEE; R. A. THOMPSON; SHERRY MCFEATERS; LIEUTENANT MONROE; SERGEANT UPTON; PHYSICIAN BOWE, Defendants - Appellees, and DOCTOR CIBUB, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:03-ct-00350-F) Submitted: July 6, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6077 DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBY LEE; R. A. THOMPSON; SHERRY MCFEATERS; LIEUTENANT MONROE; SERGEANT UPTON; PHYSICIAN BOWE, Defendants - Appellees, and DOCTOR CIBUB, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:03-ct-00350-F) Submitted: July 6, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dontez Lamont Simuel, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dana Hefter Davis, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Simuel v. Lee, No. 5:03-ct-00350-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer