Filed: Jul. 26, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2257 JOSEPH NYENTCHO, Petitioner, versus ALBERT R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-924-954) Submitted: June 22, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ana T. Jacobs, ANA T. JACOBS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2257 JOSEPH NYENTCHO, Petitioner, versus ALBERT R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-924-954) Submitted: June 22, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ana T. Jacobs, ANA T. JACOBS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2257
JOSEPH NYENTCHO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERT R. GONZALES,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A97-924-954)
Submitted: June 22, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ana T. Jacobs, ANA T. JACOBS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C.,
for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, James A
Frederick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Nyentcho, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to
reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Barry v. Gonzales,
435
F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied,
127 S. Ct. 1147
(2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re Nyentcho, No. A97-924-954
(B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -