Filed: Aug. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6676 BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLON WILLOUGHBY; DETECTIVE KENNON; OFFICER TORRANCE; S. P. BARDY, Detective; CAPITAL FORD; JEFFREY P. MANN; MACTEC ENGINEERING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03121-BO) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007 Before W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6676 BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLON WILLOUGHBY; DETECTIVE KENNON; OFFICER TORRANCE; S. P. BARDY, Detective; CAPITAL FORD; JEFFREY P. MANN; MACTEC ENGINEERING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03121-BO) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007 Before WI..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6676 BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLON WILLOUGHBY; DETECTIVE KENNON; OFFICER TORRANCE; S. P. BARDY, Detective; CAPITAL FORD; JEFFREY P. MANN; MACTEC ENGINEERING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03121-BO) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Willoughby, No. 5:06-ct-03121-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
