In Re: Webb v., 07-6669 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 07-6669
Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6669 In Re: WILLIAM EUGENE WEBB, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:06-cv-00096-FPS-JSK) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Eugene Webb, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Eugene Webb petit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6669 In Re: WILLIAM EUGENE WEBB, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:06-cv-00096-FPS-JSK) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Eugene Webb, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Eugene Webb petiti..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6669 In Re: WILLIAM EUGENE WEBB, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:06-cv-00096-FPS-JSK) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Eugene Webb, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Eugene Webb petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has recently denied the petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Webb’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source: CourtListener
