Filed: Aug. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7329 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NESTOR CAMPOS-ALONZO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7329 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NESTOR CAMPOS-ALONZO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7329
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NESTOR CAMPOS-ALONZO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nestor Campos-Alonzo, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nestor Campos-Alonzo appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Campos-Alonzo, Nos.
1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB (M.D.N.C. filed June 30, 2006;
entered July 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -