Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cartier v. Image 75, 07-1340 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1340 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1340 VERONICA CARTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IMAGE 75, a/k/a Life Style Lift Clinic; SUZANNE KIM DOUD GALLI, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00294-LMB) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Jud
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1340 VERONICA CARTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IMAGE 75, a/k/a Life Style Lift Clinic; SUZANNE KIM DOUD GALLI, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00294-LMB) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Veronica Cartier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Veronica Cartier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissing her remaining claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2007). We further affirm the district court’s order denying Cartier’s Notice of Removal of Material filed for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer