Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bergara v. Chafin, 07-6314 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6314 Visitors: 73
Filed: Sep. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6314 MARJIL LEE BERGARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. BENTON CHAFIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (7:07-cv-00061-jpj) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marjil Lee Bergara, Appellant P
More
                             UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 07-6314



MARJIL LEE BERGARA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus


A. BENTON CHAFIN,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00061-jpj)


Submitted: August 30, 2007                 Decided:   September 6, 2007


Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Marjil Lee Bergara, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Marjil Lee Bergara appeals the district court’s order

dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 
403 U.S. 388
 (1971).   We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous.   Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.   See Bergara

v. Chafin, No. 7:07-cv-00061-jpj (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2007).      We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                         DISMISSED




                              - 2 -

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer