Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Monroe v. Fletcher, 07-6585 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6585 Visitors: 302
Filed: Sep. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6585 HASTON RICHARD MONROE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUSAN FLETCHER; FLOYD G. AYLOR; G. WAYNE PIKE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00288-jct) Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 14, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Aff
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6585 HASTON RICHARD MONROE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUSAN FLETCHER; FLOYD G. AYLOR; G. WAYNE PIKE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00288-jct) Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 14, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haston Richard Monroe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips, Grundy, Virginia; Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Haston Richard Monroe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Monroe v. Fletcher, No. 7:05-cv-00288-jct (W.D. Va. Mar. 16, 2007). We deny both Appellees’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, and Appellees’ motion for extension of time to file a reply brief as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer