Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ashby, 07-6784 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6784 Visitors: 171
Filed: Sep. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6784 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRANDY CHENELL ASHBY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00329-RBH-1) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandy Chenell Ashby, Ap
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6784 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRANDY CHENELL ASHBY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00329-RBH-1) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandy Chenell Ashby, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brandy Chenell Ashby appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reduce her sentence and motion for modification of amended judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ashby, No. 4:05-cr-00329-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007).* We deny Ashby’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The notice of appeal is only timely as to the district court’s order entered April 30, 2007. To the extent Ashby intends to challenge her sentence or the amended judgment of conviction entered August 21, 2006, the appeal is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer