Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brown v. Dotson, 07-6770 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6770 Visitors: 38
Filed: Sep. 19, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6770 JAMES BENJAMIN BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAM DOTSON, in his individual capacity; CHRIS SURRATT, in his individual capacity; JAMES JOHNSON, in his individual capacity; CURTIS STURGILL, in his individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, in his individual capacity; BOYD BENNETT, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Nor
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6770 JAMES BENJAMIN BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAM DOTSON, in his individual capacity; CHRIS SURRATT, in his individual capacity; JAMES JOHNSON, in his individual capacity; CURTIS STURGILL, in his individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, in his individual capacity; BOYD BENNETT, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00114-03-MU) Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Benjamin Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Benjamin Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Dotson, No. 1:07- cv-00114-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer