Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Straws v. Crawford, 07-6761 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6761 Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6761 JABBAR JOMO STRAWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JASON CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriff’s Department; JASON SHULER, Batesburg Leesville Police Department, Defendants - Appellees, and LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BATESBURG-LEESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:06-cv-03220-HFF)
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6761 JABBAR JOMO STRAWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JASON CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriff’s Department; JASON SHULER, Batesburg Leesville Police Department, Defendants - Appellees, and LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BATESBURG-LEESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:06-cv-03220-HFF) Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jabbar Jomo Straws, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee Jason Crawford. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Jabbar Jomo Straws appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straws v. Crawford, No. 4:06-cv-03220-HFF (D.S.C. May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer