Filed: Nov. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1779 EUGENE ROBERT ZARWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KING & NORDLINGER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01938-WMN) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1779 EUGENE ROBERT ZARWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KING & NORDLINGER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01938-WMN) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene R..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1779 EUGENE ROBERT ZARWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KING & NORDLINGER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01938-WMN) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Robert Zarwell, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn Perry Parker, KING & NORDLINGER, LLP, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eugene Robert Zarwell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his action filed under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zarwell v. King & Nordlinger, LLC, No. 1:05-cv-01938-WMN (D. Md. June 6, 2006 & July 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
