Filed: Nov. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1785 KAREN VAN GORKOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEUTSCHE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02802-WDQ) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Van Gorkom, Ap
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1785 KAREN VAN GORKOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEUTSCHE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02802-WDQ) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Van Gorkom, App..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1785 KAREN VAN GORKOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEUTSCHE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02802-WDQ) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Van Gorkom, Appellant Pro Se. Tom A. Jerman, Evelyn L. Becker, Heejung Heidi Son, Sarah A. Goldfrank, Anne Nicole Cortina, O’MELVENY & MYERS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Karen Van Gorkom appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) motion to dismiss her claims for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank, No. 1:04-cv-02802-WDQ (D. Md. July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
