Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kazadi v. Mukasey, 07-1073 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1073 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1073 TSHIBOLA CHANY KAZADI, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-276-089) Submitted: September 24, 2007 Decided: November 30, 2007 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Nyoh, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, M
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1073 TSHIBOLA CHANY KAZADI, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-276-089) Submitted: September 24, 2007 Decided: November 30, 2007 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Nyoh, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tshibola Chany Kazadi, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Kazadi’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kazadi, No. A96-276-089 (B.I.A. Dec. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer