Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harris v. Food Lion, 07-1831 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1831 Visitors: 37
Filed: Nov. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1831 LISA MARIE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FOOD LION; MICHELLE WOUND, a/k/a Michelle Young, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge. (3:06-cv-03430-BM) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.* Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1831 LISA MARIE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FOOD LION; MICHELLE WOUND, a/k/a Michelle Young, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge. (3:06-cv-03430-BM) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.* Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa Marie Harris, Appellant Pro Se. David Andrew Williams, Carmelo B. Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Lisa Marie Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on her civil action alleging she was falsely arrested. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Food Lion, No. 3:06-cv- 03430-BM (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2007). We also deny Harris’ pending motions for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer