Filed: Nov. 26, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7017 MICHAEL BUCHANAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LENIS PHIPPS, Nurse, KMCC; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; NOELLE SHAW-BELL, Assistant Attorney General for Virginia; BOB MCDONALD, Attorney General for Virginia; MARY GILBERT, Head Nurse, KMCC; FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roano
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7017 MICHAEL BUCHANAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LENIS PHIPPS, Nurse, KMCC; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; NOELLE SHAW-BELL, Assistant Attorney General for Virginia; BOB MCDONALD, Attorney General for Virginia; MARY GILBERT, Head Nurse, KMCC; FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanok..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7017
MICHAEL BUCHANAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LENIS PHIPPS, Nurse, KMCC; GENE JOHNSON,
Director, Department of Corrections; NOELLE
SHAW-BELL, Assistant Attorney General for
Virginia; BOB MCDONALD, Attorney General for
Virginia; MARY GILBERT, Head Nurse, KMCC; FRED
SCHILLING, Director of Health Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:07-cv-00296)
Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 26, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Buchanan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Buchanan appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his request for injunctive relief.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Buchanan v. Phipps, No. 7:07-cv-00296 (W.D. Va. June
26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -