Filed: Dec. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7396 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON LEVON BURTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Levon Burton,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7396 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON LEVON BURTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Levon Burton, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7396 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON LEVON BURTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Levon Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aaron Levon Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for enlargement of time. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton, No. 4:04-cr-00087 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2007). We also deny Burton’s request for appointment of counsel and his motion for transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
