Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Garnett v. Waters, 07-7334 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7334 Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7334 BRYAN GARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY WATERS, Chief of Security; THOMPSON, Deputy Court Escort; JOHN DOE, Medical Administrator; COFRAN, Deputy; JOHN DOE, No. 1 Deputy; COLTRALL, Deputy; All others associated, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees, and COFTRAN, Deputy Court Escort, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7334 BRYAN GARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY WATERS, Chief of Security; THOMPSON, Deputy Court Escort; JOHN DOE, Medical Administrator; COFRAN, Deputy; JOHN DOE, No. 1 Deputy; COLTRALL, Deputy; All others associated, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees, and COFTRAN, Deputy Court Escort, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00314-HEH) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan Garnett, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Bryan Garnett appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garnett v. Waters, No. 3:06-cv-00314-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer