Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Crump v. Christie, 07-7260 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7260 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7260 THOMAS A. CRUMP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK C. CHRISTIE, in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; THEODORE V. MORRISON, JR., in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; JUDITH WILLIAMS JAGDMANN, in her personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; LARRY E. DURBIN, in his personal capacity as Assistant Commissioner, Customer Service, D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7260 THOMAS A. CRUMP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK C. CHRISTIE, in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; THEODORE V. MORRISON, JR., in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; JUDITH WILLIAMS JAGDMANN, in her personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; LARRY E. DURBIN, in his personal capacity as Assistant Commissioner, Customer Service, Department of Taxation; MICHAEL G. FOJTIK, in his personal capacity as Senior Auditor, Department of Taxation, Tobacco Unit, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00244-JRS) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas A. Crump, Appellant Pro Se. A. Ann Berkebile, Philip Reed DeHass, STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Flora Townes Hezel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Crump appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump v. Christie, No. 3:07-cv-00244-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2007). We deny Crump’s motion to recuse judges of this court that smoke from this case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer