Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hitt v. Enbe, 07-6662 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6662 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 17, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6662 MICHAEL HITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMY ENBE, Head Nurse-Technician at Perry Correctional Institution; STEPHEN CLAYTOR, Associate Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, sued for injunction officially and damages in individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (2:04-cv-21999-TLW)
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6662 MICHAEL HITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMY ENBE, Head Nurse-Technician at Perry Correctional Institution; STEPHEN CLAYTOR, Associate Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, sued for injunction officially and damages in individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (2:04-cv-21999-TLW) Submitted: January 7, 2008 Decided: January 17, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey W. Newman, Dowse B. Rustin, IV, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Steven M. Pruitt, MCDONALD PATRICK BAGGETT POSTON & HEMPHILL, L.L.P., Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Hitt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hitt v. Enbe, No. 2:04-cv- 21999-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer