Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Charles, 07-7415 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7415 Visitors: 41
Filed: Mar. 06, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7415 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROGER DALE CHARLES, II, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00027) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Dale Char
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7415 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROGER DALE CHARLES, II, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00027) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Dale Charles, II, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Brian Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roger Dale Charles, II, appeals the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a motion to compel his attorney to produce a full copy of the record and denying it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Charles, No. 2:04-cr-00027 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer