Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCullough v. United States, 07-2044 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-2044 Visitors: 57
Filed: Mar. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2044 GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02104-GRA) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George C. McCullough
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 07-2044



GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:07-cv-02104-GRA)


Submitted:   February 28, 2008            Decided:   March 3, 2008


Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
403 U.S. 388
 (1971).           We

have     reviewed   the   record   and     find   no   reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.    McCullough v. United States, No. 8:07-cv-02104-GRA (D.S.C.

Oct. 11, 2007).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                    AFFIRMED




                                   - 2 -

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer