Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fitts v. Bechtel Savannah, 06-2107 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-2107 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 13, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2107 EDNA MAE FITTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BECHTEL SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, Defendant - Appellee. No. 07-2158 EDNA MAE FITTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BECHTEL SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (1:04-cv-23202-HFF) Submitted: February 29, 2008 Decided: March 13, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2107 EDNA MAE FITTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BECHTEL SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, Defendant - Appellee. No. 07-2158 EDNA MAE FITTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BECHTEL SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (1:04-cv-23202-HFF) Submitted: February 29, 2008 Decided: March 13, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. No. 06-2107 dismissed; No. 07-2158 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edna Mae Fitts, Appellant Pro Se. William Harrell Foster, III, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Edna Mae Fitts appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Employer in Fitts’ employment discrimination action and denying relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Fitts’ appeal of the summary judgment motion was untimely filed. We therefore grant the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that Fitts was not entitled to the benefit of reopening the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(6). Accordingly, we affirm the order for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitts v. Bechtel Savannah River Site, No. 1:04-cv-23202-HFF (D.S.C. May 16, 2006; Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. No. 06-2107 DISMISSED No. 07-2158 AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer