Filed: Mar. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7698 JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSEPH HARRIS; MIKEAL BUSH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00113-GCM) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 28, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Fra
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7698 JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSEPH HARRIS; MIKEAL BUSH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00113-GCM) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 28, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Fran..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7698 JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSEPH HARRIS; MIKEAL BUSH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00113-GCM) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 28, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Franklin McClelland, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Franklin McClelland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClelland v. Harris, No. 5:07-cv-00113-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
