Filed: Apr. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6223 EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHEILA DAVENPORT, CEO; LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Capt.; STATE OF MARYLAND; PAULO NEGRO, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv- 02996-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismiss
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6223 EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHEILA DAVENPORT, CEO; LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Capt.; STATE OF MARYLAND; PAULO NEGRO, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv- 02996-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismisse..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6223 EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHEILA DAVENPORT, CEO; LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Capt.; STATE OF MARYLAND; PAULO NEGRO, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv- 02996-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Davenport, No. 8:07-cv- 02996-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
