Filed: Apr. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7760 WILLIAM DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PENNY ALLEN; H. L. JACKSON; DUNCAN DAVIS; DONALD CLELLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00390-GCM) Submitted: April 2, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7760 WILLIAM DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PENNY ALLEN; H. L. JACKSON; DUNCAN DAVIS; DONALD CLELLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00390-GCM) Submitted: April 2, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7760 WILLIAM DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PENNY ALLEN; H. L. JACKSON; DUNCAN DAVIS; DONALD CLELLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00390-GCM) Submitted: April 2, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Duncan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. Clelland, No. 3:07-cv-00390-GCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2007). We grant Duncan’s motion to file a supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
