Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bryant-Bunch v. Beck, 07-2030 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-2030 Visitors: 35
Filed: Apr. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2030 JUNE BRYANT—BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Prison; J. BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prison; ROBERT SMITH, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Institution; LARRY DIAL, Assistant Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Institution; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor and former Attorney General; ROY COOPER, Attorney General of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2030 JUNE BRYANT—BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Prison; J. BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prison; ROBERT SMITH, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Institution; LARRY DIAL, Assistant Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Institution; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor and former Attorney General; ROY COOPER, Attorney General of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:02-cv-00034-BO) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June Bryant—Bunch, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: June Bryant-Bunch appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bryant-Bunch v. Beck, No. 2:02-cv-00034-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003; filed Sept. 28, 2007 & entered Oct. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer