Filed: Jul. 24, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4468 In Re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL, Movants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-mc-00140-GCM-1) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4468 In Re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL, Movants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-mc-00140-GCM-1) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4468 In Re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA ---------------------------------------- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL, Movants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-mc-00140-GCM-1) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Under Seal, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew J. Hoefling, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal a district court order denying their petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm. Insofar as Appellants seek relief from their convictions, the proper avenue is to file an appeal from their judgments of convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
