Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

El Bey v. McMaster, 08-1484 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1484 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 24, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1484 SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, We the people preamble Citizen of the United States Government National of the United States, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY MCMASTER; TRACY MYERS; ROBB MCBURNEY; JIM BOGLE; SOUTH CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION; SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1484 SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, We the people preamble Citizen of the United States Government National of the United States, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY MCMASTER; TRACY MYERS; ROBB MCBURNEY; JIM BOGLE; SOUTH CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION; SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-02137-SB) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se. James Emory Smith, Jr. Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Wesley D. Few, ELLIS, LAWHORNE & SIMS, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sakima Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El Bey v. McMaster, No. 3:07-cv- 02137-SB (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer