Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bowers v. Astrue, 07-1546 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1546 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jul. 29, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Filed: July 29, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1546 (3:05-cv-03477-JRM) THURMOND B. BOWERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed June 20, 2008, as follows: On the cover sheet, attorney information section - the name of Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, is added as counsel for Appellee. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia
More
Filed: July 29, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1546 (3:05-cv-03477-JRM) THURMOND B. BOWERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed June 20, 2008, as follows: On the cover sheet, attorney information section -- the name of Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, is added as counsel for Appellee. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1546 THURMOND B. BOWERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-03477-JRM) Submitted: February 12, 2008 Decided: June 20, 2008 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTSON WENDT, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Yvette G. Keesee, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Thomas S. Inman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thurmond B. Bowers appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Bowers v. Astrue, No. 3:05-cv-03477-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer