Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dammons v. Carroll, 08-6237 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6237 Visitors: 45
Filed: Aug. 07, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6237 MICHAEL ANTHONY DAMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS R. CARROLL; GARY A. JONES; JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; JUANITA STEWART; JUDY BISHOP; JUDY STRICKLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03014-BO) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Cir
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6237 MICHAEL ANTHONY DAMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS R. CARROLL; GARY A. JONES; JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; JUANITA STEWART; JUDY BISHOP; JUDY STRICKLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03014-BO) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Dammons, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas Carlton Younger, III, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Dammons appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dammons’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dammons v. Carroll, No. 5:07-ct-03014-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer