Filed: Aug. 11, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6749 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of United States of America, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:02-cv-00555-CCB) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6749 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of United States of America, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:02-cv-00555-CCB) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6749 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of United States of America, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:02-cv-00555-CCB) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Maher, No. 1:02-cv-00555-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
