Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edwards v. TRS Staffing Solutions, Inc., 08-1412 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1412 Visitors: 49
Filed: Aug. 19, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1412 OTIS O. EDWARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRS STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00166-WDK-TEM) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirme
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1412 OTIS O. EDWARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRS STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00166-WDK-TEM) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Otis O. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth L. Goodboe, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; Robert Craig Wood, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Otis O. Edwards appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to comply with discovery orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edwards v. TRS Staffing Solutions, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00166-WDK-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 21,008; entered Mar. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer