Filed: Aug. 27, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6716 ANTONIO DEAN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00481-WDK-FBS) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Dean
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6716 ANTONIO DEAN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00481-WDK-FBS) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Dean ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6716
ANTONIO DEAN WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00481-WDK-FBS)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Dean Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Dean Walker appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice Walker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) civil
rights action. Because Walker may resubmit his complaint as
amended to cure the defects identified by the district court, the
dismissal order is not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods,
Inc.,
415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v.
Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.
1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2