Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Department, 08-6495 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6495 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6495 DONALD IVAN MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel Hill Police, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Af
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6495 DONALD IVAN MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel Hill Police, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district court’s* order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dep’t, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19, 2008). We also deny McCray’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) (2000). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer