Filed: Aug. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6381 CLARENCE T. FOX, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN J. LAMANNA, in his individual capacity; R. MCLAFFERTY, in his individual capacity; BRIAN FINNERTY; BRIAN GILMORE, Defendants - Appellees, and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its official capacity; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his individual capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6381 CLARENCE T. FOX, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN J. LAMANNA, in his individual capacity; R. MCLAFFERTY, in his individual capacity; BRIAN FINNERTY; BRIAN GILMORE, Defendants - Appellees, and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its official capacity; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his individual capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6381
CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN J. LAMANNA, in his individual capacity; R. MCLAFFERTY, in
his individual capacity; BRIAN FINNERTY; BRIAN GILMORE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its official capacity; HARLEY G.
LAPPIN, in his individual capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (2:06-cv-01785-GRA)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence T. Fox, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v.
LaManna, No. 2:06-cv-01785-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3