Filed: Oct. 29, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7110 GEORGE D. GATES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7110 GEORGE D. GATES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7110 GEORGE D. GATES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George D. Gates, Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall, Catherine DeRoever Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George D. Gates appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Gates’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and its orders denying Gates’ motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons state by the district court. Gates v. Stansberry, No. 1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 23, 2008; filed June 17, 2008; entered June 19, 2008; filed June 30, 2008; entered July 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2