Filed: Nov. 13, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2193 RUTH GEBRU GEBRESSELASSIE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: October 24, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2193 RUTH GEBRU GEBRESSELASSIE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: October 24, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant At..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2193
RUTH GEBRU GEBRESSELASSIE,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: October 24, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, James E. Grimes, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Angela N. Liang, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ruth Gebru Gebresselassie, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the immigration
judge’s order denying Gebresselassie’s motion to reconsider. We
have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of
discretion. See Ogundipe v. Mukasey,
541 F.3d 257, 263 (4th
Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2