Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sanders v. Sumter City Police Department, 08-6518 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6518 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6518 RICKY DARREN SANDERS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUMTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, care of Chief Patty Patterson; TODD SIMS, Detective; CORPORAL SHIRER, City Police Sumter, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03408-MBS) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008 Before MOTZ and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6518 RICKY DARREN SANDERS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUMTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, care of Chief Patty Patterson; TODD SIMS, Detective; CORPORAL SHIRER, City Police Sumter, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03408-MBS) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred Johnston Cox, ELLIS, LAWHORNE & SIMS, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. Sumter City Police Dep’t., No. 6:06- cv-03408-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer