Filed: Dec. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7204 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TERRANCE WAYNE GLENN, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:05-cr-01003-HMH-11) Submitted: November 18, 2008 Decided: December 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance Wayne Gle
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7204 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TERRANCE WAYNE GLENN, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:05-cr-01003-HMH-11) Submitted: November 18, 2008 Decided: December 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance Wayne Glen..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7204 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TERRANCE WAYNE GLENN, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:05-cr-01003-HMH-11) Submitted: November 18, 2008 Decided: December 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance Wayne Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terrance Wayne Glenn appeals the district court’s order granting him a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Glenn, No. 7:05-cr- 01003-HMH-11 (D.S.C. July 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
