Filed: Dec. 02, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7727 DOUGLAS L. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARK TIMOTHY WILLIAMS; HALIFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; PROBATION AND PAROLE DISTRICT O8, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00436-JCT-MFU) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and GRE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7727 DOUGLAS L. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARK TIMOTHY WILLIAMS; HALIFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; PROBATION AND PAROLE DISTRICT O8, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00436-JCT-MFU) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREG..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7727 DOUGLAS L. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARK TIMOTHY WILLIAMS; HALIFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; PROBATION AND PAROLE DISTRICT O8, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00436-JCT-MFU) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Williams, No. 7:08-cv-00436- jct-mfu (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
