Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moseley v. Circuit Court of Arlington County, 08-1912 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1912 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 19, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1912 JONATHON MOSELEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, the Honorable Benjamin Kendrick; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Joanne Alper; THE OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE COURT, (Elected) By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Paul Ferguson, Clerk Possibly as Co-Plaintiff to receive Guidance; COLBY MAY, Esq. Officer of the Court
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1912 JONATHON MOSELEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, the Honorable Benjamin Kendrick; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Joanne Alper; THE OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE COURT, (Elected) By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Paul Ferguson, Clerk Possibly as Co-Plaintiff to receive Guidance; COLBY MAY, Esq. Officer of the Court; DAVID K. HALLER, Esq. Officer of the Court, Defendants – Appellees, and BRAD WEISS, Esq. Officer of the Court, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00255-CMH-TRJ) Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathon Moseley, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jonathon Moseley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moseley v. The Circuit Court of Arlington, No. 1:08-cv-00255-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed July 17, 2008 and entered July 18, 2008). We deny Moseley’s motion for summary disposition and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer