Filed: Mar. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7163 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM LEE PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Patt
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7163 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM LEE PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Patte..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7163
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM LEE PATTERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Patterson appeals the extent of the
reduction granted in his motion for reduction of sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Patterson, No. 2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1 (E.D
Va. filed May 27, 2008; entered May 28, 2008); see United
States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2