Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hughes, 08-7611 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-7611 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7611 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN ERIC HUGHES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Eric Hughes, App
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7611 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN ERIC HUGHES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Hughes’ motion to file a supplemental informal brief, we deny Hughes’ motions to stay the appeal and to modify or correct the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer